Myths and Mistakes in New Testament Textual Criticism
Since the unexpected popularity of Bart Ehrman's bestselling Misquoting Jesus, textual criticism has become a staple of Christian apologetics.
Ehrman's skepticism about recovering the original and inerrant text of the New Testament does deserve a response. However, this renewed apologetic interest in textual criticism has created fresh problems for evangelicals. An unfortunate proliferation of myths, mistakes, and misinformation has arisen about this technical area of biblical studies.
In this volume Elijah Hixson and Peter Gurry, along with a team of New Testament textual critics, offer up-to-date, accurate information on the history and current state of the New Testament text that will serve apologists and Christian students even as it offers a self-corrective to evangelical excesses.
"The authors in this book offer a necessary corrective to decades of overly exuberant apologetic arguments—arguments that have actually hurt the Christian faith. The writers are refreshingly honest, and they do not pull their punches. They observe poignantly that apologetic works on the reliability of the New Testament text have been drifting away from a proper, well-researched, accurately documented scholarship that is anchored to actual data. Apologists have had a tendency to regurgitate other apologetic works, which in turn are based on other apologetic works. Meanwhile, the scholarship that is supposedly behind the popular declarations in many an evangelical trade book is out-of-date, misunderstood, or simply ignored.
These young scholars have something to say—not only to Christian speakers and writers but to non-Christian speakers and writers and even to New Testament scholars of all stripes. I was happily stunned to see the depth of discussion, the candid examination, and the up-to-date bibliography in each chapter. Although Myths and Mistakes in New Testament Textual Criticism is written in clear, user-friendly prose, the contents are well-grounded and perspicacious. I intend to utilize this volume unapologetically in my introduction as a primary source for several analyses."
List of Figures
Daniel B. Wallace
Peter J. Gurry and Elijah Hixson
2. Myths about Autographs: What They Were and How Long They May Have Survived
Timothy N. Mitchell
3. Math Myths: How Many Manuscripts We Have and Why More Isn't Always Better
Jacob W. Peterson
4. Myths about Classical Literature: Responsibly Comparing the New Testament to Ancient Works
James B. Prothro
5. Dating Myths 1: How We Determine the Ages of Manuscripts
6. Dating Myths 2: How Later Manuscripts Can Be Better Manuscripts
Gregory R. Lanier
7. Myths about Copyists: the Scribes Who Copied Our Earliest Manuscripts
Zachary J. Cole
8. Myths about Copying: the Mistakes and Corrections Scribes Made
9. Myths about Transmission: The Text of Philemon from Beginning to End
S. Matthew Solomon
10. Myths about Variants: Why Most Variants Are Insignificant and Why Some Can't Be Ignored
Peter J. Gurry
11. Myths about Orthodox Corruption: Were Scribes Influenced by Theology and How Can We Tell?
Robert D. Marcello
12. Myths about Patristics: What the Church Fathers Thought about Textual Variation
13. Myths about Canon: What the Codex Can and Can't Tell Us
John D. Meade
14. Myths about Early Translations: Their Number, Importance, and Limitations
15. Myths About Modern Translations: Variants, Verdicts, and Versions
Edgar Battad Ebojo
List of Contributors
Ancient Writings Index